Positioning the idea
Clarify the audience, purpose, distinctiveness and the book’s central promise.
Working together
My role is to help make your book clearer, stronger and more publishable while keeping it recognisably yours. I bring editorial judgement, publishing experience and constructive challenge. You remain the author and make the final decisions.
What I can help with
Every book needs something different. We’ll identify the intervention that will make the greatest difference now, rather than assuming a full programme of work.
Clarify the audience, purpose, distinctiveness and the book’s central promise.
Strengthen the structure, chapter summaries, sample material and publisher-facing documents.
Work on structure, argument, pacing, explanation, case studies and consistency.
Consider suitable routes, publisher conversations and the practical steps ahead.
Developmental feedback is about the book’s larger shape and effectiveness. It is different from copy-editing, proofreading and fact-checking. We’ll be explicit about the work you need and what the agreed deliverable includes.
How we’ll work
A good editorial relationship is candid, collaborative and practical. We protect momentum without pretending the creative process is always tidy.
We confirm the scope, materials, timing, fee and expected output in writing before a new piece of work begins.
A proposal, chapter or defined section is often more useful than waiting for a perfect full manuscript.
Rough drafts and unresolved questions are welcome. Mark gaps, uncertainties and areas where you want particular help.
Use one current master file, with a date or version number, and explain what has changed since the last review.
I distinguish essential reader-facing issues from optional suggestions. You can ask me to explain or prioritise any comment.
Tell me early if your availability or timetable changes. We can reset the plan instead of letting an outdated deadline create pressure.
What I need from you
Please provide the material needed for the agreed task, flag confidential or sensitive content, and identify permissions or factual checks that remain outstanding.
You are responsible for the accuracy of the subject matter, the rights to use material and final approval of the manuscript. I can identify questions, but I cannot independently verify every technical claim or secure permissions unless we specifically agree that work.
A useful handover
Using AI responsibly
AI can be a useful assistant, but the expertise, judgement, argument and voice should remain yours. Treat its output as provisional and keep responsibility for the finished work.
If AI has materially shaped research, analysis, structure, images or wording, keep a short note of the tool and how you used it. Tell me when you send the work and follow the publisher’s disclosure rules.
Ready to begin?